Columns Opinion

The witch-hunt

By
Published December 18, 2008 at 5:05 am

Half Nelson
rang@theguidon.com

Like our very own Malu Fernandez, Tracy Borres seems to have become every Ateneans’ and every Ateneo alumni’s object of ridicule and disgust overnight. One that warrants space on our blog entries. One that warrants an album in our Multiply account. One that warrants a lecture from our professors. One that has made it into our Yahoo! Groups, in between the usual org promotions and your teachers’ announcements.

And for what?

Tracy Isabel Borres (IV AB Psy) or, as one blogger calls her, “The Notorious TIB” posted a Facebook entry about her immersion, a Theology 141 requirement and an Atenean rite of passage. Instead of the enlightenment one supposedly gets from immersion, Tracy was unflinchingly and insensitively frank, and called immersion her “WORST NIGHTMARE” and personal “HELL.” With no proper plumbing, electricity, and a proliferation of semi-naked “wet with their sipon” children, Tracy resorted to “mentally blocking everything” to make it through her ordeal.

It is very easy to crucify Tracy. She represents the Atenean stereotype people warned you about before entering the school–that of apathetic, privileged kids who want nothing to do with the Other, who are content with shopping and partying their trust funds away. And in fact, she has already been crucified, in the thousand blog entries criticizing her upbringing, her lifestyle, her personhood.

But we’re all missing something here. By posting and reposting, sending and resending those blog entries, we are violating her right to privacy. In case anyone forgets, Tracy posted those entries on a personal blog for her group of friends. As any Facebook user knows, anything you post on your account is private and only viewable by people in your group. Obviously, someone violated Tracy’s trust, and that’s not our fault. But by joining in on this lynching, we are all accountable.

I am not defending her comments. God knows (and I’m sure she knows) they were mean and elitist… but they were also her comments, however disappointing they may be. She has the right to feel those feelings and say those things, especially to her circle of friends. There is, however, something wrong about a private person’s life splashed all over the Internet for everyone to judge and critique.

Yes, the comments she made on her blog might’ve been insensitive and nasty. But how about us? By joining in on this very public crucifixion of this private person’s life, doesn’t that also make us insensitive and nasty? Or does being on our collective moral high horse give us permission to breach privacy?

Maybe it’s the celebrity culture we live in. Everyday on his popular website, gossip blogger Perez Hilton labels any random celebrity he dislikes “ho” or “slut.” Sometimes these accusations are baseless and perhaps we learned our blogger ethics from Perez–anonymous behind the computer screen, we can call anyone anything we like without being accountable for it. These people are just pictures and names on our computer screens. We don’t have to give them any respect because they’re not real people to us–we don’t actually know them. There is no bearing on our real lives.

Right now, people are formulating theories about how Tracy Borres is symptomatic of everything wrong with the Atenean. I say let’s call a spade a spade. This is her life. These are her opinions. Nothing more, nothing less.


How do you feel about the article?

Leave a comment below about the article. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

  • Reacting on her thoughts, it is ironic that she’s seeking a degree in psychology. As an apprentice of that field, she should have been able to understand…

    But you have to spare her some mercy. Indeed, the person who took screenshots of her private notes has violated her privacy. As she posted the entry in her private column, we have no right, aside from those she gave permission to, in the first place to actually “know” what she posted there.
    Give her a breather. Her opinions may indeed be relatively conceited, but nevertheless exist in her private realm. Just as you don’t attack those who curse and swear mentally without manifesting it physically, we simply can’t openly criticize her private thoughts and opinions, even if it is on cyberspace.

  • Whether her act of posting a note is private or not is completely beside the point. She was criticized not merely because she posted her thoughts but mainly because of the thought itself. For someone who’s in supposedly one of the Philippines’ premier schools, her opinion on indigenous people is extremely ignorant and discriminatory.

  • Related Articles


    Opinion

    October 4, 2022

    Chloe

    Opinion

    October 4, 2022

    Pet stores

    Opinion

    October 4, 2022

    Letting your heart dance

    From Other Staffs


    Sports

    April 24, 2026

    Cabaluna Jr. and Williams lead historic podium for Blue Eagles in last day of UAAP Taekwondo

    Sports

    April 23, 2026

    Ateneo Taekwondo Teams push through Day 3, highlighted by Cabaluna Jr.’s dominance

    Opinion

    April 22, 2026

    Environmentalism beyond fashion

    Tell us what you think!

    Have any questions, clarifications, or comments? Send us a message through the form below.