News

SJC maintains ruling, 2017 Constitution valid

By and
Published September 29, 2017 at 10:39 am

DISCLAIMER: These events reported are a work of fiction, and are a part of the ongoing Mock Trial: Javellana Case hosted by the Loyola Schools Office of the Ombudsman and The GUIDON.

The Student Judicial Court (SJC) has unanimously maintained its previous ruling in favor of the Office of the Sanggunian President and the validity of the 2017 Constitution despite more evidence presented by petitioners during the second trial.

The trial was set after petitioners filed a motion for reconsideration on Monday, September 25 after the SJC deemed the Plebiscite and the ratification of the 2017 Constitution valid and within bounds of the law.

Witnesses of the alleged unofficial plebiscite voting were presented to the Court, along with video interviews and transcripts from other members of the student assembly.

An interview with Abel Almario, a member of the Ateneo Commission on Elections (COMELEC), was also presented. Asked about the voting process, the commissioner stated that the COMELEC had indeed asked the student assembly to raise hands if they agreed to the Constitution.

Almario’s statement contradicted the witness’ stand.

One of the witnesses present during the Plebiscite said that they were “simply asked to stand up and raise hands,” unaware that they were voting for the ratification.

Despite opposition, the prosecution argued that the witnesses’ statements were consistent, such that the Plebiscite was not “properly handled,” and that the student assembly had not been briefed and had not given their consent on the ratification of the Constitution.

However, the Court dismissed the prosecution’s evidence on grounds of insufficiency, as narratives from only eight people were presented to the Court.

“It shows that these eight people and this one single Plebiscite that was held is not sufficient enough…to represent the supposed 95% of agreement from the student body,” the defense argued.

According to the Court decision press release, “The Court constrained to hold that…the people may be deemed to have cast their favorable votes in the belief that in doing so they did the part required of them.

It may be said that in its political aspect, which is what counts most, after all, said Article has been substantially complied with, and, in effect, the 2017 Constitution has been constitutionally ratified.”


How do you feel about the article?

Leave a comment below about the article. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

Related Articles


News

November 15, 2024

Jordan Brand introduces newest batch of Atenean Wings Scholars

News

November 13, 2024

AEWU wins labor case on illegal wage deductions, Ateneo admin appeals decision to Court of Appeals

News

November 12, 2024

Office of Student Discipline establishes Canvas course to streamline services, promote Code of Conduct principles

From Other Staffs


Sports

November 22, 2024

Ateneo Table Tennis Teams nab three victories in successful fourth day

Sports

November 22, 2024

Blue Eagles garner mixed results against rivals in the sands

Sports

November 22, 2024

Blue Eagles falter against Tamaraws, absorb second loss of Season 87

Tell us what you think!

Have any questions, clarifications, or comments? Send us a message through the form below.